Skip Navigation to main content U.S. Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
Alternative Fuels & Advanced Vehicles Data Center
About the AFDCFuelsVehiclesFleetsIncentives and LawsData, Analysis and TrendsInformation ResourcesHome
Alternative and Advanced Fuels

Selected Citation

View html (http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/es8011436)

Document Number

10429

Primary Title

Life-Cycle Assessment of Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Soybean-Derived Biodiesel and Renewable Fuels (Journal Article summary)

Author Name

Huo, H.; Wang, M.; Bloyd, C.; Putsche, V.

Author Affiliation

Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois; Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois; Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois; National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado

Published Date

12/23/2008

Detailed Publish Date

December 23, 2008

Page Count

15

Document Type

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Publisher Name

American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C.

Abstract

This study used Argonne National Laboratory’s Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation (GREET) model to assess the life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission impacts of four soybean-derived fuels: biodiesel fuel produced via transesterification, two renewable diesel fuels (I and II) produced from different hydrogenation processes, and renewable gasoline produced from catalytic cracking. Five approaches were employed to allocate the coproducts: a displacement approach; two allocation approaches, one based on the energy value and the other based on the market value; and two hybrid approaches that integrated the displacement and allocation methods. The relative rankings of soybean-based fuels in terms of energy and environmental impacts were different under the different approaches, and the reasons were analyzed. Results from the five allocation approaches showed that although the production and combustion of soybean-based fuels might increase total energy use, they could have significant benefits in reducing fossil energy use (>52%), petroleum use (>88%), and GHG emissions (>57%) relative to petroleum fuels. This study emphasized the importance of the methods used to deal with coproduct issues and provided a comprehensive solution for conducting a life-cycle assessment of fuel pathways with multiple coproducts.

Copyright Status

Y - Copyrighted--no reprint permission,

Document Owner

H